Irrigation efficiency - Revision history

Avinash Kumar at 14:29, 16 August 2016

2016-08-16T14:29:50Z

Jana Herold at 12:15, 19 April 2013

2013-04-19T12:15:51Z

Jana Herold: /* References */

2013-04-19T12:15:30Z

‎References

Jana Herold: Created page with " In irrigated agriculture, water normally has to be conveyed from a source (river, lake, reservoir, well) to the field, eighter by canals or by pipes. Depending on the conditi..."

2013-04-19T12:13:53Z

Created page with " In irrigated agriculture, water normally has to be conveyed from a source (river, lake, reservoir, well) to the field, eighter by canals or by pipes. Depending on the conditi..."

New page

In irrigated agriculture, water normally has to be conveyed from a source (river, lake, reservoir, well) to the field, eighter by canals or by pipes. Depending on the condition of the infrastructure, the length of the canals and the climate, there are [[Water_losses|water losses]] during the transport in the canal system: percolation into the ground, seepage through the canal bunds, spilling over the bunds and through holes in the bunds, uptake by weeds on the bunds or banks and evaporation from the water surface. A decisive factor regarding losses is the material of the canals. In earthen canals, losses are higher than in lined canals. In lined canals, losses depend on the condition of the lining.

The losses can be estimated and/or measured and allow to assess the conveyance efficiency (ec) in percent. According to FAO between 60 - 95 % conveyance efficiencies (see Table 1) and 60 - 90 % field application efficiencies apply (Table 1).

{| style="width: 497px; height: 208px;" border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"
|-
| style="width: 176px;" |

| style="width: 208px;" colspan="3" |
Earthen canals

| style="width: 104px;" |
Lined canals

|-
| style="width: 176px;" |
Soil type

| style="width: 76px;" |
Sand

| style="width: 66px;" |
Loam

| style="width: 66px;" |
Clay

| style="width: 104px;" |

|-
| style="width: 176px;" |
Canal length

| style="width: 76px;" |

| style="width: 66px;" |

| style="width: 66px;" |

| style="width: 104px;" |

|-
| style="width: 176px;" |
Long (>2000 m)

| style="width: 76px;" |
60 %

| style="width: 66px;" |
70 %

| style="width: 66px;" |
80 %

| style="width: 104px;" |
95 %

|-
| style="width: 176px;" |
Medium (200 - 2.000 m)

| style="width: 76px;" |
70 %

| style="width: 66px;" |
75 %

| style="width: 66px;" |
85 %

| style="width: 104px;" |
95 %

|-
| style="width: 176px;" |
Short(< 200 m)

| style="width: 76px;" |
80 %

| style="width: 66px;" |
85 %

| style="width: 66px;" |
90 %

| style="width: 104px;" |
95 %

|}

Table 1: Indicative values of conveyance efficiencies for adequately maintained canals<ref name="FAO">FAO (1989): Irrigation Water Management: Irrigation Scheduling. http://www.fao.org/docrep/T7202E/t7202e08.htm#annex%20i:%20irrigation%20efficiencies
[accessed 19 April 2013]</ref>

Water losses on-farm or on the field are caused by deep percolation to soil layers below the crop root zone, by surface run-off, by use of weeds and by evaporation from the soil surface between the crops. Another important factor is the farmer’s training and knowledge with regard to agriculture and irrigation.

{| border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"
|-
| style="width: 281px;" |
Irrigation method

| style="width: 198px;" |
Field application efficiency

|-
| style="width: 281px;" |
Surface irrigation (border, furrow, basin)

| style="width: 198px;" |
60 %

|-
| style="width: 281px;" |
Sprinkler irrigation

| style="width: 198px;" |
75 %

|-
| style="width: 281px;" |
Drip irrigation

| style="width: 198px;" |
90 %

|}

Table 2: <span lang="en-gb" style="font-family: "arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 11pt; mso-ansi-language: en-gb; mso-fareast-font-family: calibri; mso-bidi-font-family: "times new roman"; mso-fareast-language: en-us; mso-bidi-language: ar-sa;">Indicative values of field application efficiencies<ref name="FAO">FAO (1989): Irrigation Water Management: Irrigation Scheduling. http://www.fao.org/docrep/T7202E/t7202e08.htm#annex%20i:%20irrigation%20efficiencies
[accessed 19 April 2013]</ref></span>

= References =

<references />

[[Irrigation_and_the_environment_-_A_review_of_environmental_issues|Irrigation and the environment - A review of environmental issues]]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-In irrigated agriculture, water normally has to be conveyed from a source (river, lake, reservoir, well) to the field, eighter by canals or by pipes. Depending on the condition of the infrastructure, the length of the canals and the climate, there are [[Water losses|water losses]] during the transport in the canal system: percolation into the ground, seepage through the canal bunds, spilling over the bunds and through holes in the bunds, uptake by weeds on the bunds or banks and evaporation from the water surface. A decisive factor regarding losses is the material of the canals. In earthen canals, losses are higher than in lined canals. In lined canals, losses depend on the condition of the lining.
+In irrigated agriculture, water normally has to be conveyed from a source (river, lake, reservoir, well) to the field, eighter by canals or by pipes. Depending on the condition of the infrastructure, the length of the canals and the climate, there are during the transport in the canal system: percolation into the ground, seepage through the canal bunds, spilling over the bunds and through holes in the bunds, uptake by weeds on the bunds or banks and evaporation from the water surface. A decisive factor regarding losses is the material of the canals. In earthen canals, losses are higher than in lined canals. In lined canals, losses depend on the condition of the lining.
-The losses can be estimated and/or measured and allow to assess the conveyance efficiency (ec) in percent. According to FAO between 60 - 95 % conveyance efficiencies (see Table 1) and 60 - 90 % field application efficiencies apply (Table 1).
+The losses can be estimated and/or measured and allow to assess the conveyance efficiency (ec) in percent. According to FAO between 60 - 95&nbsp;% conveyance efficiencies (see Table 1) and 60 - 90&nbsp;% field application efficiencies apply (Table 1).
-{| style="width: 497px; height: 208px;" border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"
+{| cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="1" style="width: 497px;  height: 208px"
 |-
-| style="width: 176px;" |
+| style="width: 176px" |
 <br/>
-| style="width: 208px;" colspan="3" |
+| colspan="3" style="width: 208px" |
 Earthen canals
-| style="width: 104px;" |
+| style="width: 104px" |
 Lined canals
 |-
-| style="width: 176px;" |
+| style="width: 176px" |
 Soil type
-| style="width: 76px;" |
+| style="width: 76px" |
 Sand
-| style="width: 66px;" |
+| style="width: 66px" |
 Loam
-| style="width: 66px;" |
+| style="width: 66px" |
 Clay
-| style="width: 104px;" |
+| style="width: 104px" |
 <br/>
 |-
-| style="width: 176px;" |
+| style="width: 176px" |
 Canal length
-| style="width: 76px;" |
+| style="width: 76px" |
 <br/>
-| style="width: 66px;" |
+| style="width: 66px" |
 <br/>
-| style="width: 66px;" |
+| style="width: 66px" |
 <br/>
-| style="width: 104px;" |
+| style="width: 104px" |
 <br/>
 |-
-| style="width: 176px;" |
+| style="width: 176px" |
 Long (>2000 m)
-| style="width: 76px;" |
+| style="width: 76px" |
-%
+&nbsp;%
-| style="width: 66px;" |
+| style="width: 66px" |
-%
+&nbsp;%
-| style="width: 66px;" |
+| style="width: 66px" |
-%
+&nbsp;%
-| style="width: 104px;" |
+| style="width: 104px" |
-%
+&nbsp;%
 |-
-| style="width: 176px;" |
+| style="width: 176px" |
 Medium (200 - 2.000 m)
-| style="width: 76px;" |
+| style="width: 76px" |
-%
+&nbsp;%
-| style="width: 66px;" |
+| style="width: 66px" |
-%
+&nbsp;%
-| style="width: 66px;" |
+| style="width: 66px" |
-%
+&nbsp;%
-| style="width: 104px;" |
+| style="width: 104px" |
-%
+&nbsp;%
 |-
-| style="width: 176px;" |
+| style="width: 176px" |
 Short(< 200 m)
-| style="width: 76px;" |
+| style="width: 76px" |
-%
+&nbsp;%
-| style="width: 66px;" |
+| style="width: 66px" |
-%
+&nbsp;%
-| style="width: 66px;" |
+| style="width: 66px" |
-%
+&nbsp;%
-| style="width: 104px;" |
+| style="width: 104px" |
-%
+&nbsp;%
 |}
@@ Line 101: / Line 101: @@
 Water losses on-farm or on the field are caused by deep percolation to soil layers below the crop root zone, by surface run-off, by use of weeds and by evaporation from the soil surface between the crops. Another important factor is the farmer’s training and knowledge with regard to agriculture and irrigation.
-{| border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"
+{| cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="1"
 |-
-| style="width: 281px;" |
+| style="width: 281px" |
 Irrigation method
-| style="width: 198px;" |
+| style="width: 198px" |
 Field application efficiency
 |-
-| style="width: 281px;" |
+| style="width: 281px" |
 Surface irrigation (border, furrow, basin)
-| style="width: 198px;" |
+| style="width: 198px" |
-%
+&nbsp;%
 |-
-| style="width: 281px;" |
+| style="width: 281px" |
 Sprinkler irrigation
-| style="width: 198px;" |
+| style="width: 198px" |
-%
+&nbsp;%
 |-
-| style="width: 281px;" |
+| style="width: 281px" |
 Drip irrigation
-| style="width: 198px;" |
+| style="width: 198px" |
-%
+&nbsp;%
 |}

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-In irrigated agriculture, water normally has to be conveyed from a source (river, lake, reservoir, well) to the field, eighter by canals or by pipes. Depending on the condition of the infrastructure, the length of the canals and the climate, there are [[Water_losses|water losses]] during the transport in the canal system: percolation into the ground, seepage through the canal bunds, spilling over the bunds and through holes in the bunds, uptake by weeds on the bunds or banks and evaporation from the water surface. A decisive factor regarding losses is the material of the canals. In earthen canals, losses are higher than in lined canals. In lined canals, losses depend on the condition of the lining.
+In irrigated agriculture, water normally has to be conveyed from a source (river, lake, reservoir, well) to the field, eighter by canals or by pipes. Depending on the condition of the infrastructure, the length of the canals and the climate, there are [[Water losses|water losses]] during the transport in the canal system: percolation into the ground, seepage through the canal bunds, spilling over the bunds and through holes in the bunds, uptake by weeds on the bunds or banks and evaporation from the water surface. A decisive factor regarding losses is the material of the canals. In earthen canals, losses are higher than in lined canals. In lined canals, losses depend on the condition of the lining.
 The losses can be estimated and/or measured and allow to assess the conveyance efficiency (ec) in percent. According to FAO between 60 - 95 % conveyance efficiencies (see Table 1) and 60 - 90 % field application efficiencies apply (Table 1).
@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 |-
 | style="width: 176px;" |
+<br/>
 | style="width: 208px;" colspan="3" |
@@ Line 29: / Line 29: @@
 | style="width: 104px;" |
+<br/>
 |-
@@ Line 36: / Line 36: @@
 | style="width: 76px;" |
+<br/>
 | style="width: 66px;" |
+<br/>
 | style="width: 66px;" |
+<br/>
 | style="width: 104px;" |
+<br/>
 |-
@@ Line 97: / Line 97: @@
 |}
-Table 1: Indicative values of conveyance efficiencies for adequately maintained canals<ref name="FAO">FAO (1989): Irrigation Water Management: Irrigation Scheduling. http://www.fao.org/docrep/T7202E/t7202e08.htm#annex%20i:%20irrigation%20efficiencies
+Table 1: Indicative values of conveyance efficiencies for adequately maintained canals<ref name="FAO">FAO (1989): Irrigation Water Management: Irrigation Scheduling. http://www.fao.org/docrep/T7202E/t7202e08.htm#annex%20i:%20irrigation%20efficienciesfckLR[accessed 19 April 2013]</ref>
 [accessed 19 April 2013]</ref>
 Water losses on-farm or on the field are caused by deep percolation to soil layers below the crop root zone, by surface run-off, by use of weeds and by evaporation from the soil surface between the crops. Another important factor is the farmer’s training and knowledge with regard to agriculture and irrigation.
@@ Line 133: / Line 132: @@
 |}
-Table 2: <span lang="en-gb" style="font-family: &quot;arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 11pt; mso-ansi-language: en-gb; mso-fareast-font-family: calibri; mso-bidi-font-family: "times new roman"; mso-fareast-language: en-us; mso-bidi-language: ar-sa;">Indicative values of field application efficiencies<ref name="FAO">FAO (1989): Irrigation Water Management: Irrigation Scheduling. http://www.fao.org/docrep/T7202E/t7202e08.htm#annex%20i:%20irrigation%20efficiencies
+Table 2: <span lang="en-gb">Indicative values of field application efficiencies<ref name="FAO">FAO (1989): Irrigation Water Management: Irrigation Scheduling. http://www.fao.org/docrep/T7202E/t7202e08.htm#annex%20i:%20irrigation%20efficienciesfckLR[accessed 19 April 2013]</ref></span>
 [accessed 19 April 2013]</ref></span>
-−
 = References =
@@ Line 141: / Line 138: @@
 <references />
-[[Irrigation_and_the_environment_-_A_review_of_environmental_issues|GIZ (1993): Irrigation and the environment - A review of environmental issues. Part II: Environmental considerations in planning and operations.]]
+[[Irrigation and the environment - A review of environmental issues|GIZ (1993): Irrigation and the environment - A review of environmental issues. Part II: Environmental considerations in planning and operations.]]