|
|
(2 intermediate revisions by one user not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
− |
| |
− |
| |
| *Cost Effective | | *Cost Effective |
| *Timely and rapid crop establishment | | *Timely and rapid crop establishment |
| *High-speed operations | | *High-speed operations |
− | *Less labour is required | + | *Less labour is required |
| *Lower fuel cost | | *Lower fuel cost |
| *Improve in soil structure through incorporation of crop residues | | *Improve in soil structure through incorporation of crop residues |
Line 11: |
Line 9: |
| | | |
| However an additional application of herbicides is an additional expenditure. | | However an additional application of herbicides is an additional expenditure. |
| + | |
| + | == Reference == |
| + | |
| + | [https://www.wocat.net/fileadmin/user_upload/documents/Books/WOOK_PART2.1.pdf Where the Land is Greener] |
| + | |
| + | __NOEDITSECTION__ |
| + | |
| + | [[Category:Impacts/Benefits_of_SLM_(On_Site/Off_Site)]] |
Latest revision as of 10:30, 7 July 2016
- Cost Effective
- Timely and rapid crop establishment
- High-speed operations
- Less labour is required
- Lower fuel cost
- Improve in soil structure through incorporation of crop residues
- More friable and less erodible soil
- Key differences is that about 4 times as many hectares of lands can be prepared as compared to non-conservation agriculture.
However an additional application of herbicides is an additional expenditure.
Reference
Where the Land is Greener